Reformed Epistemology Apologetics

Peace & Blessings Beloved,

TGBTG for allowing us to see another day. I pray all is well with you and yours, and that your week has been fruitful & blessed thus far.

Today, we're going to examine the type of apologetics known as Reformed Epistemology Apologetics. And, because of their intertwining, we'll also briefly discuss another type of apologetics, known as Pressupositional Apologetics- which we'll discuss in detail in our next post.

In theology, the term Reformed implies a connection to the Protestant Reformation, especially the work of John Calvin. In philosophy, epistemology is the study of how we know things. Both ideas are connected to the field of Reformed epistemology, which applies core principles espoused by John Calvin to our assessment of religious or spiritual truths. This approach is not identical to presuppositional apologetics, but the two are closely related. The most notable contributors to discussions on this theory are Alvin Plantinga, Nicholas Wolterstorff, and William Alston. A cornerstone of Reformed epistemology is the claim that belief in God is properly basic. Being properly basic means something is reasonable, necessary, and ultimately needs no prior proof. It can be assumed from the start and to some extent is even required for other thoughts to make sense. This implies that the existence of God is an assumption at the same logical level as that of our own existence, the validity of logic, and so forth. The idea that God’s existence is properly basic is related to Calvin’s concept of the sensus divinitatis: the claim that all people have some innate perception of God. So far as Reformed epistemology is concerned, belief in God is considered justified—acceptable or reasonable—without resorting to any particular argument or evidence. As one can imagine, this is a controversial claim, with debates on the subject occurring both within and across religious perspectives. A common criticism of this stance is that it amounts to fideism: a choice to believe just because, no matter what. However, Reformed epistemology qualifies acceptance of even properly basic beliefs as needing to be defended against reasonable objections or questions. A